Benny&Co wrote:Me too and I remember all the ho-ha about the eggs!! That blooming Eggwina Currie!!
sorry but I have to disagree and she should be patted on the back - Salmonella in the egg industry was rife in the 1980s and her comments brought a big change that was desperately needed. That and Listeria in raw milk products too. These were hygiene issues rather than food content and healthy eating advice.
Homemade wrote:Well I have to stand up for the researchers here. The way the press report it is not neccessarily what the research was saying.
I'm in agreement - the media seem to get their teeth into an article (and with all the horse meat scandal still headline news) and give a biased report without looking at the facts.
Mercedes wrote: My mum will be 90 in May and her sister is 92 so a diet high in those kinds of foods hasn't done either of them any harm
Traditional methods of preservation have changed for quick turnover- some of the specialised sausages would be stored for a long time in certain conditions until mature but these days this is changed and:
rhubarb93 wrote:preserved with nitrites.
which is very bad for health and a known carcinogen if eaten in quantity (hence, the advice to cut down on the bacon and preserved sausages) However, even traditional methods could be bad for health if the food was not carefully prepared and got contaminated with deadly pathogens. It would seem using nitrites is the lesser of 2 evils but in moderation.
Currently obesity is a big problem (excuse the pun) world wide and lots of foods high in saturated fats are targetted. Our parents/grandparents actually ate far more fats than what we do today, but then they didn't drive cars and have such a sedentary life style. Fat was considered calories that got burned in exercise from physical hard work (compare yesterday a shovel to today a petrol driven digger) and kept people warm during cold winter weather, whereas today most people live and work in central heated environments.