According to a magazine article I was reading, intensively reared chicken has a lower carbon foot print that of free range (including eggs). On the same lines wild caught salmon cost much more fuel that farmed and organic salmon is worse for the environment than non-organic. Red meat and dairy are the two biggest offenders although the happy cow grazing in a lush green pasture f*rts more than one in a barn feeding on pellets. It will also probably surprise you that a 25g bag of crisps is four times less damaging than 500g of cherry tomatoes (grown inside). On the whole the majority of us have a much higher food print than we do car print; and that includes the vegetarians who although about a third lower than us corpse crunchers are far from innocent.
It’s all to do with what it takes to produce a set amount of food and how much carbon or similar gasses such as nitreous oxide are emmited into the atmosphere.
Obviously this doesn’t take into account the ethics or even the non-greenhouse damage that is being done but it still got me thinking… and no I won’t be turning into a vegat.. veg… ve… someone who doesn’t eat meat.