I did quite enjoy the last episode, actually. But I don't think he came up with any new or surprising conclusions. I suspect that, because this was just a three-part TV series, they had to make it all very two-dimensional and choppy to fit into the format.
I agree it was a bit weird that having to pay his car insurance (however did he think he was going to do that?) and getting very upset about having to ask for his wallet back, he then went out and splurged in the music shop. Still, only human!
Was it just me, or did anyone else find it a bit uncomfortable watching that nice young man (who had to replace the wheelbarrow the vicar had broken) admit that, though he would have preferred to accept the lamb as payment in kind, he actually needed the money? It seemed a bit intrusive to me, and I wonder how he really felt about having to say that on the telly?
It struck me that the message they came up with was very much what the American book Your money or your life said years ago.
Jane